The All Progressives Congress (APC) in Bauchi State has found itself at a critical juncture, grappling with an internal crisis that threatens to unravel its very fabric.
What should have been a period of strategic consolidation has instead devolved into a landscape of confusion, deep-seated resentment, and a mass exodus of loyal members.
Many within the party lament that this predicament was entirely avoidable. At the heart of the crisis lies a profound failure in internal governance.
The party, it appears, neglected the fundamental principles of fairness, openness, and genuine consultation.
What was anticipated to be a transparent political process instead manifested as a meticulously orchestrated arrangement, seemingly driven by personal agendas and future political aspirations.
The consequences of this approach are now starkly evident, as APC Bauchi pays a heavy price for its missteps.
Adding to the party’s woes is the widespread perception that M.A. Abubakar, the current figurehead, lacks the requisite political strength, energy, and broad appeal to effectively challenge the opposition.
Far from galvanizing support, his emergence has exacerbated internal divisions, fueled frustration among the party’s base, and accelerated defections across various political structures.
A particularly painful development for many supporters has been the sidelining of prominent aspirants such as Amb. Yusuf Maitama Tuggar. 
To thousands of APC loyalists, Tuggar represented more than just another candidate; he embodied a modern political force capable of restoring confidence and attracting wider public support.
His profile boasted national visibility, diplomatic experience, youth appeal, intellectual prowess, and growing grassroots acceptance.
Crucially, he symbolized hope for a new era of APC politics in Bauchi State. Yet, many now feel that merit, popularity, and acceptability were callously sacrificed for the sake of personal political arrangements.The danger is further amplified by the prevailing belief that the entire strategy was conceived with short-term gains in mind, rather than the long-term survival of the party.
There is a strong perception that the arrangement was designed to facilitate the return of a former governor for a single term, merely as a stepping stone for another political ambition. This perception has inflicted undeniable political damage.
Today, APC Bauchi is not only hemorrhaging members but is actively cultivating new adversaries. The distinction between losing supporters and creating opponents—individuals motivated by disappointment, anger, and exclusion—is a critical one in politics, and the party is now facing the latter.
Across the state, the signs of decay are unmistakable:
* Influential stakeholders are defecting.
* Grassroots coordinators are withdrawing their loyalty.
* Youth supporters are increasingly frustrated.
* Local party structures are weakening.
* A silent resentment permeates numerous political camps.
These departing individuals are not mere rank-and-file members; they possess established political structures, loyal followings, electoral value, and significant influence within their communities. Each defection erodes the confidence of remaining supporters and bolsters rival political platforms. Alarmingly, many of these crises are self-inflicted.
A political party cannot consistently marginalize committed stakeholders, disregard mounting dissatisfaction, and expect unity to miraculously endure.
Politics demands inclusion, genuine consultation, and respect for those who contribute to its foundation. Unfortunately, APC Bauchi appears increasingly fractured between those striving to safeguard the party’s future and those prioritizing personal political interests. This division is fostering a bitterness that could take years to heal.
Many supporters who once passionately defended the party are now questioning their allegiance. Some have already moved on, while countless others remain silent observers, awaiting the opportune moment to make their decisions.
The reality is stark:
* No political party thrives by humiliating its strongest assets.
* No political structure endures by continuously creating internal enemies.
* No party with a weak candidate can successfully challenge the opposition.This is an urgent plea for immediate intervention before situation becomes irreversible. The leadership of the APC, at both state and national levels, must act decisively.
Crucially, the party must acknowledge the strategic political value of leaders like Amb. Yusuf Maitama Tuggar, whose influence, acceptance, and credibility remain vital for the future strength of APC in Bauchi State.
Time is running out. The warning signs are undeniable. Defections escalating, frustration is mounting, and the losses are becoming impossible to ignore. APC Bauchi must swiftly determine whether it seeks to build a united future or continue down the path of counting its losses.
